Best tools for systematic review screening?
Short answer
Rayyan is often the easiest starting point for budget-conscious teams. Covidence is common for larger review workflows. ASReview is strong for solo or computationally curious researchers. DistillerSR suits institutional teams. LancetClaw fits after screening, when you need paper review, source judgement, and reference checks.
Execution Steps
- 1Estimate your review scope: number of records, team size, and budget.
- 2For free/low-budget: try Rayyan (free) or ASReview (free, AI-prioritized screening).
- 3For team reviews: use Covidence (standard for Cochrane) or DistillerSR (enterprise).
- 4After screening, export included studies to LancetClaw for paper review and reference checking.
- 5Use PRISMA flow diagram to document your screening process.
Prompt Template
I have [N] records from [databases] for a systematic review on [topic]. I am [solo/team of N] with a budget of [amount]. Which screening tool should I use?
Common Failure Points
- Choosing a tool without testing it with a sample of your actual records
- Not using dual independent screening (most guidelines require two reviewers)
- Forgetting to review included sources after screening
FAQ
Composite User Feedback
Medical Student
"The answer pages helped me move from not understanding a paper to knowing which part I should read next."
Clinician
"These guides work because they answer the practical question first, then point me to the workflow I should use."
Medical Librarian
"The strongest pages are the ones that can stand alone as answers and still route people into the right LancetClaw skill."